HIVECASE / PUBLIC RECORDIndependent research · Hive

Evidence for the public record EST. 2026

Follow the
evidence.

HiveCase examines disputed public-interest claims connected to the Hive blockchain. Primary sources, on-chain records, party statements and unanswered questions are kept visibly separate.

Browse open filesRead the standard

Open files

Current cases

Each file is a dated research snapshot. New evidence can narrow, revise or overturn an earlier finding.

CASE001OPEN FILE
UnresolvedWrestling Organization OnlineUpdated 30 July 2026

WOO, public funding
& the missing reconciliation

A source-led review of DHF funding, sponsored wrestling events, observable game activity and the July 2026 Perry Saturn dispute—including what the records do not prove.

Read the complete evidence file
Identified Value Plan outflows
84,139.680 HBD
WOO-related, 2023–2025
Proposal 346 paid
32,373.084 HBD
43.164% of maximum ask
Lifetime match accounts
139
April 2024–July 2026
Defensible conclusion
Transparency gap
Owner responsible for reconciliation
CASE002OPEN FILE
Measurement gap

Hive Rally · Value Plan · Updated 30 July 2026

International exposure,
no public return model

Raw transfers, WRC results, publicity claims, community concentration and the unresolved reconciliation of a co-branded rally car.

Adjusted raw
1.771M HIVE
+ 107,877.822 HBD
Community concentration
95.2%
posts by one account
Read case 002
CASE003OPEN FILE
Cost proof gap

Street Workout Community · Updated 30 July 2026

Real events,
unreconciled line-item costs

Sand, bars, accommodation, medical supplies and participant allegations tested separately against payments, memos and Value Plan responses.

Broad case ledger
385,420.04 HBD
+ 31,953 HIVE
Observed authors
401
20,093 root posts
Read case 003
CASE004OPEN FILE
Reconciliation gap

CWP LATAM · Venezuela · Updated 30 July 2026

Water service reported,
vendor ledger unpublished

Fourteen Value Plan transfers traced through conversion and a Binance collection path; physical project reporting tested against the engineering, beneficiary and monitoring records still absent from the public file.

Verified funding
69,583.910 HBD
14 Value Plan transfers
Exchange-path output
296,879.261 HIVE
40 collection transfers
Read case 004
CASE005OPEN FILE
Control failure

VIBES · Value Plan · Updated 30 July 2026

Music scaled,
controls broke

Forty-one paid prize rounds, one unmatched final prize promise, a shared exchange-routing cluster and the public evidence behind—and missing from—Value Plan’s shutdown allegations.

Gross VIBES funding
55,900 HBD
53,300 HBD net after refund
Paid core prize rounds
41
47,800 HBD reconciled
Read case 005

Reading key

The evidence standard

Every material statement should tell the reader what kind of claim it is and how much confidence the record supports.

01

Verified record

A claim supported by a directly inspectable blockchain transaction, proposal, publication or other primary record.

02

Party record

A statement or document published by a person or organization involved. Attributed, preserved and not treated as independent proof.

03

Allegation

A disputed claim that is material to the case. Reported in context and never presented as an established fact.

04

Unresolved

A gap the available public evidence cannot close. Missing records are identified without speculating about what they would show.

The central rule

Absence of a public receipt can establish a transparency gap. By itself, it cannot establish theft, fraud or personal enrichment.

Research method

How a case is built

Hive’s public ledger makes some facts unusually inspectable. It does not make off-chain contracts, fiat payments or private intent visible.

  1. 1

    Collect

    Find the original post, video, proposal, transaction and statement—not just commentary about it.

  2. 2

    Trace

    Follow public blockchain flows and time-stamped records while preserving links another reader can verify.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Set public promises, observable activity and competing accounts beside one another.

  4. 4

    Publish

    State the narrowest defensible conclusion, show the evidence, label uncertainty and log material corrections.

Publication principles

A record that can be challenged

  • Direct links. Readers should be able to inspect the source behind a claim.
  • Fair attribution. Competing accounts are attributed to the people making them.
  • Right of reply. Responses and documentary corrections belong in the case record.
  • Narrow findings. Conclusions stop where the available evidence stops.

The archive starts here

Five cases.
Every source visible.

Browse the case files